A fringe-benefit tax option with a large precedent
The first of Tax Foundation's five revenue raisers is modest per client and a turn toward base-broadening over rate-raising.
Tax Foundation's new compendium, Options for Reforming America's Tax Code 3.0, lays out 86 tax-code changes; 52 of them reduce the federal deficit on a dynamic basis over a decade that begins with annual red ink near $2 trillion. Among the five revenue raisers the guide highlights for policymakers, the first is the one high-net-worth advisors are most likely to underestimate: Option 32, which eliminates the income tax exclusion for employer-paid fringe benefits.
The value of an on-site gym, an employer student-loan payment, or an employee discount never appears in taxable income today, but the Foundation's option would sweep those benefits into taxable compensation the same way cash wages are taxed, leaving the primary deficit $396.8 billion lower from 2027 to 2036 on its dynamic model.
A wealthy client will not unwind an estate plan over a health-club membership. That is why Option 32 is easy to skim. The Foundation is not proposing this change so much as pricing a trade-off, and the trade-off is base-broadening over rate-raising: Congress, facing $2 trillion annual deficits, will want revenue with a smaller economic sting. The same logic that sweeps in fringe benefits reaches deferred compensation, employer education assistance, and executive perks, all of which sit on the same side of the line, and once that line moves, the definition of taxable income changes, not just the rate schedule. Clients who have spent years optimizing around current exclusions will find their Roth conversion sequencing and charitable strategies still sound, but operating inside a code whose foundation has shifted.
The practical issue for advisors is valuation: most clients cannot say what their fringe benefits are worth because tax software never asked. If the change becomes law, the first planning conversation will be about assigning prices to benefits that have never had them and about restructuring compensation toward whatever exclusions survive, and firms that do that scenario work now—as this publication has argued—are the ones making tax planning the visible skill in the high-net-worth conversation. For everyone else, $396.8 billion is an asterisk until the morning a client's W-2 arrives with a new line on it.