A Daily Network publication
Explore the network
Wealth Advisor Daily
The advisor's edition — practice, portfolio, and the book.
Monday, August 31, 2026The Morning Brief →Sign in
The Book

Art loans tap equity without the capital-gains hit

Banks typically advance 40% to 60% of appraised value, so the tax math favors borrowing over selling — but high specialty-loan costs keep art lending at the bottom of most liquidity playbooks.

Art lending earns its place as a niche tax-alpha tool, and the reason starts with the tax code. Borrowing against a Picasso can raise cash without raising a taxable event. Banks typically advance 40% to 60% of an artwork's appraised value, and the loan itself creates no income because the borrower has an obligation to repay it, Financial Planning reports. The money becomes taxable only when the repayment obligation disappears and the client still holds the cash, Duncan Campbell, principal and individual tax leader at Baker Tilly, told Financial Planning.

That tax logic makes borrowing appealing for collectors who want to keep the painting. Joon Um, a Beverly Hills tax advisor at Secure Tax & Accounting, told Financial Planning via email that borrowing instead of selling avoids capital gains, but he also flagged high interest, appraisal fees, low loan values, and the risk of losing the piece. It may work for clients with valuable art, strong cash flow, and a clear repayment plan; the loan does not automatically create a tax deduction.

The economics are the problem. Wesley Karger, co-founder of TwinFocus, told Financial Planning that art lending is "last on our list in terms of a strategy that would be feasible for a client," because it is expensive even for specialty lending. The advance is only 40% to 60% of appraised value, and if the loan fails, the bank takes possession of the artwork, just as it would with real estate collateral, according to Campbell. Using art as collateral has drawbacks compared with other debt-based liquidity methods.

Still, there are situations where the tax and ownership advantages outweigh the cost. Rebecca Fine, CEO of Athena Art Finance, told ARTnews that art lending can be useful when heirs are split over whether to preserve a collection or take distributions, a situation that can arise inside a trust. It also lets a client avoid selling in a rush and instead take time to optimize the sale.

For a client with valuable art, a clear repayment plan, and a reason not to sell — a family collection, a legacy asset, or a trust that shouldn't realize gains — the math can work. For everyone else, the appraisal fees and specialty-loan pricing make it a break-glass instrument. Advisors who document the loan's terms and the client's cash-flow plan are doing the right diligence. Those who treat it as a routine source of cash are likely to be the ones explaining the repossession risk when the payment comes due.

Sources & further reading
Financial Planning
More from Wealth Advisor Daily
The Book

Slott's Roth screen makes conversion a standing call

Six client categories, anchored by the outside-cash test, give advisors a repeatable Roth conversion agenda.
The Book

The 4% withdrawal drain is eating the inheritance

Two retirement-industry warnings put the 4% withdrawal drain at the center of the Great Wealth Transfer.
The Advisor's Note

The cap table now decides who wins $1B teams

Ownership equity, not the wirehouse checkbook, is deciding which firms land the next $1 billion team.
Elsewhere in the networkAll titles →
Every weekday · 6:30 a.m. ET

The Morning Brief

The private wealth industry in four minutes, every weekday at 6:30 a.m. ET. Free.