Fidelity's allocation team calls the Q2 rebound a caution on valuations
The recovery broadened and AI capital spending powered earnings, but the team says historically high prices leave little room for error.
Fidelity's Asset Allocation Research Team — the unit whose recommendations guide the firm's fund managers — opens its Q2 2026 market update with a recovery story and closes with a warning. The rebound came after a rocky first quarter, as geopolitical fears receded and oil prices fell from their peaks. The report's final pages make the defensive case: historically high valuations and a medium-term mix of policy, inflation, and geopolitical risk leave diversification as the main defense.
AART sits inside Fidelity's institutional business, doing the fundamental and quantitative work behind the firm's investment views. It turns macroeconomic, policy, and financial-market trends into asset-allocation recommendations for portfolio managers and investment teams, covering both strategic and active decisions. The quarterly update is the most direct public look at that thinking.
The returns matched the recovery narrative, but with one meaningful twist: participation broadened. Equities rose, and smaller U.S. companies joined the advance after years of lagging their larger rivals. Bond returns were positive across fixed income markets even as the Federal Reserve turned more hawkish. Commodities fell as geopolitical risk crested, and gold dropped sharply, giving back a piece of its strong 2025 run.
Earnings strength, in the report's telling, comes from two forces. AI-related capital spending kept working its way into corporate results, and a labor market showing early signs of recovery eased the slowdown worries that hung over the first quarter. Fidelity also credits optimism about the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for pulling oil back toward its pre-Iran-conflict levels.
The cushion question
The caution is about valuation. Fidelity calls markets historically expensive and singles out U.S. and emerging-market stocks tied to AI as particularly pricey. Those prices may not trip up the market in the near term, the team argues, but they leave little cushion if the medium term brings policy surprises, an inflation re-acceleration, or a geopolitical shock. The update stops short of predicting a pullback; it says the setup for one exists.
It lists the unresolved items — geopolitical uncertainty, monetary policy direction, inflation persistence, elevated valuations — as a set rather than a forecast. None has to break for the market to get hurt; the risk is that several move at once.
The macro backdrop does not resolve that tension. Fidelity sees the U.S. economy in mid-cycle dynamics — solid activity, an early labor-market recovery — while domestic activity in China stays subdued. Most developed markets kept their cyclical momentum even with elevated energy prices and supply-chain disruptions. Globally, industrial activity expanded, and new orders rose relative to inventories in the U.S., other developed economies, and emerging markets. That is evidence that the expansion has room to absorb shocks.
Corporate earnings continued to broaden, with tech-concentrated emerging economies and the U.S. leading the way. That matters as much to advisors as the return numbers. A rally carried by one theme is easy to chase; one where small caps, bonds, and foreign earnings participate gives a client portfolio a reason to look the way it does.
The report distinguishes strategic from active allocation. AART is not arguing for an exit from equities. It is arguing that long-term policy weights have to withstand a valuation reset, and that near-term tilts toward whatever worked last quarter should respect that constraint. That is a client-ready way to explain why the portfolio is built the way it is: a market can be making money and still be fragile.
The second quarter made the diversification case easy to explain. The rest of 2026 will test whether the report's caution or its recovery confidence holds up.